September 23, 2013
Committee:
UK Core Education Committee (UKCEC)
Date of Meeting:
Monday, September 23, 2013
Location of Meeting:
Room 107 Breckinridge Hall, 2:00-4:00 pm
Members Present | Ex-Officio Present | Guests Present |
Jonathan Allison | Mike Shanks | Leah Simpson |
Ruth Beattie | Debbie Sharp | Chris Thuringer |
Russell Brown | ||
Tracy Campbell | ||
Amy Gaffney | ||
Nancy Jones | ||
Juliana McDonald | ||
Brian McNely | ||
Ben Withers (Chair) |
Minutes:
- Approval of minutes from September 9, 2013 meeting
Approved by consensus.
- Consent agenda
STA 296DL: Statistical Methods and Motivations (SIR) – need to request DL syllabus
-approved
- UK Core Summit follow-up
Observations and suggestions from UKCEC members:
- Attendees seemed less anxious about the assessment process this year
- Overall more comfortable with the Core, but more anxious about the new budget model as it relates to the Core
-
MOOCs in relation to UK Core
- the Chemistry MOOC may prepare students to test out of a UK Core requirement
-
Concern regarding DL courses transferring into UK and counting for Core credit
- But if the course has been approved by that university as DL and counts for gen ed credit there, it should count for Core credit here
-
Recommendation to move the Summit to later in the semester
- Will be part of the discussion for next year – what information to share, how and when to share it
- Add student and faculty success stories to share what’s happening in each area
-
Find ways to provide information to Deans to help facilitate discussion within the departments
- What areas of Core are still in need of course submissions?
- What can departments do to contribute to the Core?
- Find ways to help orientate new faculty to UK Core, like having a representative present at new faculty orientation
-
Some departments are waiting to see how big of an effect the new budget model will have, and how they will need to adjust course offerings
- May be a good opportunity to promote UK Core course
- Regular Reporting
Quarterly reports related to UK Core that would be helpful and meaningful for UKCEC oversight of the Core
- Individual course assessments: when artifacts are assessed, how do evaluators interpret the artifact? What comments are made? Is it assessing what it’s meant to?
- For Core courses, when are students taking them (freshman year, junior year, etc.)? Do departments need to offer more courses at a certain level?
- Are seats available to freshmen when their enrollment window opens, or have classes been filled by upper level students?
- Information Literacy
Debbie Sharp circulated a general definition of information literacy that could be included on each area’s course review form.
- Add this to the UK Core website
- Add general definition to each course review form, or if any area has their own specific definition that can be added instead
- Members should send the information they want included on their area’s review form to Chris and Joanie so that forms can be edited
- Communicate this change to instructors teaching UK Core courses
- Other Items
Discussion regarding assessment data possible changing to a portfolio-based evaluation
- Meeting will be held October 4 to discuss with C&C as they explore a portfolio style assessment
- Meeting adjourned at 3:20 pm.
Prepared by Joanie Ett-Mims on September 24, 2013
Download the minutes:
Download the agenda:
Academic Year:
2013-2014