By D. Stephen Voss
Abstract: Explores the controversial 1996 success of three African-American incumbents (Sanford Bishop and Cynthia McKinney of Georgia; Corrine Brown of Florida) who lost their majority-black Southern congressional districts to Supreme Court decisions. Using aggregate electoral data and Gary King’s solution to the ecological inference problem, the paper seeks to gauge (1) the extent of bias against black candidates, (2) the extent of backlash against black voters, and (3) the extent to which incumbency explains away the Georgia victories. The findings are compatible with neither a full defense of racial redistricting nor an attack on it. Rather, while Southern white voters appear to exhibit neither consistent bias against black candidates nor backlash against black voters, racial polarization is nonetheless evident, and dispersed in a geographically systematic manner. Barriers against black representation still appear strong - Bishop’s victory, in particular, seems the result of incumbency - but they may not be the same electoral barriers that civil-rights activists assume when they embrace majority-minority districts.
A Winzip file available for downloading here includes:
These files can be read using the freeware Ghostview/Ghostscript, available from numerous Internet sites (including ftp.cs.wisc.edu).
Feel free to cite this work, and please let me know if you do so!
To Voss Conference Papers listing
Back to Voss Home Page