|
Corn & Soybean News October, 2007, Volume 7, Issue 8 Cooperating
Departments: Agricultural Economics, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering,
Entomology, Plant and Soil Sciences, Plant Pathology Editor:
|
In this
Issue:
1.
Nutrient
Removal of Corn Stover & Soybean Hay
2.
Insect
Control in Stored Grain
3.
Low Soil
pH Values in Dry Soils 4. Grain Crop Management: Early Bird Series
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nutrient Removal of Corn Stover & Soybean Hay Lloyd Murdock and Greg
Schwab, Plant and Soil Sciences The dry weather has
made hay supplies short, prompting many farmers to look to corn stover and
whole soybeans as forage sources. Grain producers want to know how much
nutrient removal is occurring and the cost of the removal. Corn
Stover A yield of 150 to 175
bu/ac results in about 8,000 lbs/acre of corn stover. The total nutrients in this 8,000 pounds is
N = 55, P2O5 = 27 and K2O = 115 pounds per
acre. If one calculates that a large
round bale of corn stover is about 1,200 lbs then the nutrient removal will
be about N = 8, P2O5 = 4 and K2O = 17
lbs/bale. Calculating the cost of
nutrients per bale using nutrient prices of N = $0.40/lb, P2O5
= $0.30/lb and K2O = $0.25/lb results in 2 different
figures. Most people use only P2O5
and K2O costs because the nitrogen in the stover would
likely be lost via denitrification, but P and K would normally be recycled as
the residue decomposes resulting in a nutrient removal cost of about $5.50
per bale. If nitrogen is also
calculated into the costs, it becomes about $8.50 per bale. Soybean
Hay Soybeans baled for hay
removes all parts of the plant and the amount of nutrients removed in the hay
depends on the stage of growth and the amount of vegetative growth. In the calculations below, two growth
stages have been assumed for nutrient removal purposes. The R3 (beginning pod) and the R5
(beginning seed) growth stages because they seem to approximate the growth
stage and amount of pod fill in the severe drought areas. The costs of the nutrients removed were
calculated using P2O5 = $0.30/lb and K2O =
$0.25/lb. Table 1. Nutrient removal and value of nutrients removed from soybean. Values
presented in this table assume average soybean yields.
|
· Corn stover and soybean
hay will remove extra P and K. · Know these costs when
marketing corn stover or soybean hay. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Insect Control in Corn Storage Doug Johnson,
Entomology There continue to be
questions concerning insect control in stored corn storage. At this time of year it is too late to
employ many of the important strategies. But let’s have a quick review. First and foremost:
“store clean dry grain in clean dry bins”.
This will solve the vast majority of problems. Below find a checklist of good storage
techniques. UK-IPM
Checklist for Controlling Insects in Stored Corn Doug Johnson,
Extension Entomologist and Sam McNeill, Extension Agricultural Engineer, University
of Kentucky Before Harvest /
Pre-Binning
During Harvest /
Binning
Post-Harvest / After Binning
Insecticides and
Fumigants Recommended for Corn Do not use malathion for any treatments. Most forms of malathion
are no longer labeled for use and the product no longer provides adequate
insect control. See: ENT-16 Insecticide Recommendations for Corn. Empty
bins - applied to walls
and floor: Tempo7 SC Ultra. (DO NOT APPLY TO GRAIN!), Actellic® 5E, or
Insecto. Do not use the same product
for empty bin and grain “protectant” treatments. Under Floor Fumigants - Chloro-pic (Can not currently be shipped in small
containers, you may find that your local dealer has some on hand or in large
e.g 200 lb. bottles), Methyl-Bromide, Phostoxin® / Fumtoxin®. THESE PRODUCTS ARE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
AND REQUIRE SPECIAL EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING! Protectant -
applied directly to the bulk grain: Actellic® 5E. Insecto may be used as a
“protectant”, but some buyers will not accept grain treated with this
material. Be sure of your market. (If
grain is handled and stored properly this is not generally economically
advisable.) Cap out treatment applied to the top 4" of grain - (Do not make this application if a protectant has been
applied to the bulk grain): Actellic® 5E and Insecto for beetles and moths or
products containing Bacillus thuringiensis, e.g. Dipel7, Javelin7, Sok-B.t.7
etc. for Indian meal moth. For more information about crop and livestock pests, visit
"Insect Management Recommendations".
|
· Store clean dry grain in
clean dry bins. · Follow the checklists for
each stage of storage. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Low Soil pH Values this Fall Lloyd Murdock, Paula
Howe, Greg Schwab and Frank Sikora, Plant and Soil Sciences and Regulatory
Services Soil samples taken
from abnormally dry soils likely will result in soil test pH values being lower
than actual soil pH values. Soluble salts have accumulated near the soil
surface under dry conditions causing the pH to be lowered. Typically, a combination of plant uptake
and adequate rainfall to percolate through the soil is sufficient to keep the
soluble salt content in the field soils low enough that pH’s on fall soil
samples are not noticeably low. The
drought has greatly reduced plant growth (thereby lowering the total amount
of salts taken up by the plants), and lack of rainfall to leach high levels
of salts deeper into the soil causing pH’s to be abnormally lowered. In 1991, a similar
condition existed, causing Ken Wells and Grant Thomas (former UK Agronomy
Professors) to check soil samples from two Jessamine County drought-stricken
tobacco fields. The samples were split
with the pH measured on one-half of the sample as taken and the other half
was leached to remove soluble salts before the pH reading. The soil pH
rebounded after leaching of soluble salts from the sample. This will also occur in the field when we
get normal rainfall. Table 1. Soil pH results from soil samples taken under dry conditions in
1991.
There are two ways to
handle this problem. 1)
The samples with very low pH’s compared to previous
samples can be resampled in late February or March after we have saturated
the profile. 2)
When soil pH is measured in a salt
solution it is usually about 0.5 units lower than pH measured in water, but the
buffer pH will not be affected by these high salts. To calculate a lime recommendation, assume
that the current water pH is about 0.5 units lower than normal and that the
buffer pH has not been affected. Using
the table in AGR-1 apply lime if needed this fall using the estimated water
pH and the actual buffer pH. |
· Dry soils results in lower
reported water pH values. · Buffer pH values should
be accurate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crop
Management: Early Bird Series Chad
Lee, Plant and Soil Sciences While
commodity prices are higher, the cost of production is also increasing rapidly,
making the final net profit a challenge. Producers need to maximize their
pre-pay dollars. Three
meetings across Kentucky will be targeting issues relating to pre-pay
decisions on seed, seed treatments, foliar fungicides, hybrids, varieties and
fertilizer options. In addition, each of these meetings will include a topic
on grain storage options. The locations, dates and contact information follows: Sedalia, Sedalia Restaurant: Thursday, November 15, 2007: contact Lincoln
Martin, (270) 527-3285. Owensboro, Daviess County Extension Office: Friday, November 16, 2007: contact
Clint Hardy, (270) 685-8480. Shelbyville, Shelby County Extension Office: Tuesday, November 20, 2007: contact
Brittany Edelson, (502) 633-4593. The
meetings are scheduled to begin at 9:00 am and will conclude between 2:30 and
3:00 pm. Lunch will be sponsored by the Kentucky Soybean Board and the
Kentucky Corn Growers Association. Pesticide education credits and certified crop advisor continuing education credits will be sought.
|
· Make the most of pre-pay
dollars. |
Copyright © 2007 University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service
An Equal Opportunity University
Please contact Chad Lee for questions or permission to reprint information from this website.