NUMBER 1205 |
July 21, 2009 |
---|
CORN |
TOBACCO |
FRUIT CROPS |
SHADE TREES & ORNAMENTALS |
TURF |
Fungicides and Stalk Quality By Paul Vincelli |
In the last week, I've received a few questions about the effect of foliar fungicides on stalk quality of corn. In 2008, stalk quality was evaluated in some of my corn fungicide research trials. When the black layer was evident in corn, stalks in each plot of these trials were split open with a knife and evaluated for stalk rot severity using a 0 to 5 scale (0 = no stalk rot evident and 5 = complete destruction of the pith with lodging below the ear; this scale was developed by Ron Hines, formerly with the University of Illinois). Urbana trial. A fungicide research trial conducted at Urbana included one hybrid considered to be susceptible to gray leaf spot (GLS) and another considered to be moderately resistant to it. In addition, this trial was mist-irrigated throughout the season to help ensure a favorable environment for GLS. Foliar disease severity was greatest on the susceptible hybrid, and the foliar fungicide (Headline at 6 fluid ounces per acre) reduced disease severity compared to the untreated control on this hybrid. On the moderately resistant hybrid, no statistical difference in foliar disease severity occurred between non-treated and Headline-treated plots. Similar to the foliar disease ratings, stalk rot severity was greatest on the GLS-susceptible hybrid, and Headline fungicide reduced stalk rot compared to the untreated control in this hybrid. On the hybrid that was moderately resistant to GLS, no differences between non-treated and Headline-treated plants occurred for stalk rot severity. Relationship between foliar disease and stalk rot. Based on the results I've presented above, I think it is fair to state that there is a relationship between foliar disease severity and stalk rot severity. This relationship has been observed before by others and has been studied in the scientific literature. When foliar disease pressure is severe, the "blighted" leaves cannot produce enough photosynthates (sugars) to adequately fill the ear. When this happens, the plant may "rob" the stalk for additional sugars, which can damage the integrity of the stalk and allow additional colonization by stalk rotting pathogens. So foliar fungicides can impact stalk rot, but they likely do not directly control stalk rot pathogens; rather, they control foliar pathogens, which allows the plant to get more photosynthates from leaf photosynthesis because of reduced foliar disease severity. Knowing this, it's likely that we will only see improved stalk quality with fungicides when foliar disease pressure is high. Funding for some of these research trials was provided by the Illinois Department of Agriculture Fertilizer Research and Education Council (FREC) and the USDA-CSREES North Central Regional Integrated Pest Management Program.--Carl A. Bradley |
Blue Mold Confirmed in Kentucky By Kenny Seebold |
For now, the areas facing the strongest threat blue mold are located in the immediate area of the current find, and eastward. Within the “danger zone”, growers are advised to begin application of fungicides as quickly as possible to help protect tobacco and to contain the outbreak. If blue mold is active on tobacco at the time of fungicide application, I recommend treatment with Quadris at 12 fl oz/A; use 8-10 fl oz/A for protection. Growers may also use the combination of mancozeb (Dithane, Penncozeb, or Manzate) plus dimethomorph (Acrobat or Forum). In this case, apply 2 lb/A of mancozeb and 3-7 oz/A of dimethomorph (user higher rates on bigger tobacco or if active disease is found). Actigard will probably not be a good choice in the areas affected by the blue mold warning, as they may have been exposed to the pathogen, and Actigard needs to be in place 4-5 days before exposure to the blue mold pathogen in order to activate plant defenses. When applying fungicides for control of blue mold, good coverage is critical for getting adequate control of disease – this means using an appropriate application volume and drop nozzles to get fungicide materials down into the lower plant canopy. The need to get after blue mold is really strong in the threatened area, because we are looking at some very favorable conditions for blue mold in the coming days. According to the forecast, we are going to have cooler-than-normal day and night temperatures, and mostly clear days. Long-distance transport will not be favorable, but we could see an explosion of blue mold within a field that has the disease and also short distances from these fields, mainly due to very favorable night-time temperatures. Another point to consider is that tobacco that has been topped, or will be topped in a few days, will be less susceptible to blue mold, and may not need an application of fungicide. However, blue mold loves suckers, so good sucker control will be important. Finally, in areas west of the current outbreak, the need to protect against blue mold is not as critical as for the affected zones. Those wishing to “play it safe” can follow the protectant guidelines listed above; if Quadris is used, they can also count on protection against target spot and frogeye if these diseases are present. The other approach is to monitor the blue mold situation and be prepared to spray immediately if movement is predicted from known sources of blue mold, or when blue mold is first found. Please keep a close watch on tobacco in your area, and let me know if you find or suspect blue mold in your area. Now that it’s here, having a good fix on the extent of the outbreak helps me keep us all up to speed. And don’t hesitate to call if you have any questions. If the blue mold situation changes, we’ll post an alert through the Kentucky Blue Mold Warning System and on the Kentucky Tobacco Disease Information Page (www.uky.edu/Ag/KPN/kyblue/kyblue.htm). Please urge producers (particularly in eastern KY)to check their crops regularly for blue mold, and let me know if you suspect or find the disease in your area. |
Stink Bugs on Tobacco By Lee Townsend |
Symptoms require several hours to develop so the culprits are long gone by the time the injury is apparent. Stink bugs are good fliers and move frequently from plant to plant as well as into and out of the field. Because of their transient nature and generally minimal damage, insecticide applications specifically for stink bug are rarely justified.
|
By Julie Beale and Paul Bachi |
On fruit and vegetable samples, we have diagnosed black rot, anthracnose and Pierce’s disease on grape; black root rot complex and common leaf spot on strawberry; leaf spot (Sphaerulina), anthracnose and Phytophthora crown rot on raspberry; scab, frogeye and cedar-apple rust on apple; leaf spot (Coccomyces) on cherry; web blight, anthracnose, common bacterial blight and Rhizoctonia root/stem rot on bean; bacterial wilt on cucumber; Alternaria leaf spot on cantaloupe; bacterial spot and southern blight on pepper; and bacterial canker, early blight, late blight, Septoria leaf spot, southern blight, blossom end rot, tobacco mosaic virus and tomato spotted wilt virus on tomato. On ornamentals, foliar disease have been widespread, including leaf streak on daylily; Cladosporium leaf blotch on peony; downy mildew on buddleia; Gloeosporium leaf spot on birch; powdery mildew and Septoria leaf spot on dogwood; Cercospora leaf spot on hydrangea, redbud, rose, euonymus, and willow; Phyllosticta leaf spot on maple, forsythia and itea; and leaf blister and anthracnose on oak. We have also seen Botryosphaeria canker on rhododendron and sumac; bacterial scorch on oak and sycamore; anthracnose and Pythium root rot on bentgrass; and brown spot on fescue. |
By Patricia Lucas | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE: Trade names are used to simplify the information presented in this newsletter. No endorsement by the Cooperative Extension Service is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products that are not named.